1. Water consumption in electricity generation (including water consumed during fuel extraction and processing)
Note:
OT: Once-through
CL: Closed-loop/cooling pond
Source: Mielke, E., Anadon, L. D., & Narayanamurti, V. (2010). Water Consumption of Energy Resource Extraction, Processing, and Conversion. Energy Technology Innovation Policy Discussion Paper, 2010-15. Harvard Kennedy School. [Full-text at http://j.mp/Water_KSG]
2. Comparison of water withdrawal across fuel cycles
Generation Technology | Water Consumption | |
(gal/MWh) | (l/MWh) | |
Nuclear, once-through | 31,701 | 120,000 |
Nuclear, recirculating | 1,321 | 5,000 |
Nuclear, cooling pond | 1,030 | 3,900 |
Coal, once-through | 25,995 | 98,400 |
Coal, recirculating | 660 | 2,500 |
Coal, cooling pond | 17,250 | 65,300 |
Oil/Gas, once-through | 22,692 | 85,900 |
Oil/Gas, recirculating | 608 | 2,300 |
Oil/Gas, cooling pond | 7,899 | 29,900 |
Wind | 61 | 230 |
PV, multi-Si | 502 | 1,900 |
PV, CdTe | 211 | 800 |
Hydro | 21 | 80 |
Biomass, Southwest | 115,707 | 438,000 |
Biomass, Midwest | 528 | 2,000 |
Source: Fthenakis, V., & Kim, H. C. (2010). Life-cycle uses of water in U.S. electricity generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 2039-2048. [Full-text at http://j.mp/Water_LCA]
3. Water intensity of electricity by fuel source and generation technology
Generation Technology | Water Consumption (gal/MWh) | |||
Total | Wet Cooling | Generation | Producing Fuel Source | |
Nuclear | 475-900 | 400-720 | 30 | 45-150 |
Fossil Thermal | 335-584 | 300-480 | 30 | 5-74 |
Coal IGCC | 342-414 | 200 | 137-140 | 5-74 |
Natural Gas Combined Cycle | 198-201 | 180 | 7-10 | 11 |
Wind | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PV | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Solar Trough | 840-1000 | 760-920 | 80 | 0 |
Solar Tower | 830 | 750 | 80 | 0 |
Biomass | 330-510 | 300-480 | 30 | Highly variable depending on whether biomass is irrigated |
Hydroelectric | 4500 | Not applicable | 0 | Highly variable, avg. 4,500 due to evaporation |
Geothermal | 1400 | 1400 | Not available | Not available |
Source: Carter, N. T., & Campbell, R. J. (2009). Water Issues of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Electricity in the U.S. Southwest. CRS Report for Congress, R40631 (June 8, 2009). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. [Full-text at http://j.mp/Water_Power]
4. Percentage distribution of cooling technology by generation type in the United States
4. Percentage distribution of cooling technology by generation type in the United States
Generation Type | Percentage (%) | |||
Wet Recirculating | Once-Through | Dry | Cooling Pond | |
Coal | 48.0% | 39.1% | 0.2% | 12.7% |
Fossil Non-Coal | 23.8% | 59.2% | 0.0% | 17.1% |
Combined Cycle | 30.8% | 8.6% | 59.0% | 1.7% |
Nuclear | 43.6% | 38.1% | 0.0% | 18.3% |
Total | 41.9% | 42.7% | 0.9% | 14.5% |
Source: National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). (2009). Estimating Freshwater Needs to Meet Future Thermoelectric Generation Requirements: 2009 Update (DOE/NETL-400/2009/1339). [Full-text at http://j.mp/Power_vs_Cooling]
No comments:
Post a Comment